BLOG@IPJUR.COMCalendar
QuicksearchArchivesCategoriesOther StuffBlog Administration |
On How To Make Use Of A Mobile eBook ReaderMonday, July 12. 2010Tools
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Thank you for your article on using e-book readers in the profession of a patent attorney. I myself started using an e-book reader one and a half year ago. My conclusion is that an e-book reader certainly has a chance of becoming a practical asset, but at present there are still quite some shortcomings.
First the advantageous: The display of e-book readers is definitely superior to your eyes and comes close to a paperlike experience, although, as noted, the contrast could still be improved. It is more like reading on non-bleached, recycled paper. (E-book readers without touch displays, or alternatively using Wacom technology apparently have a slightly better contrast.) Furthermore, you can bring an enormous load of documents, legal texts, case law, prior art, the complete file wrapper of a case, and as a bonus: your complete library of novels. The devices are now small, and light enough to be really portable and battery life is suffient for days of reading. However, the display is still slow (0.5 - 1 second, but for large scanned documents or complex PDF documents, this can turn into seconds). For reading a book from cover to cover this (0.5 - 1 second) is not really a problem, but when jumping through a document back and forth, it can become a pain. Here, the documents themselves could be of help, by including navigational aids such as cross reference links and tables of contents. That way one at least jumps right to the correct page. PDF documents already available on the net (for example Guidelines for Examination before the EPO) do not contain linked cross references. This is where an e-book reader could really shine. Preparing your own material, as described in the article, can be quite laborious. Especially, when one decides to increase the navigational options by including table of contents and linked cross references. As mentioned, a 6 inch screen is rather limited in size. Especially for prior art documents. Most patent publications are PDFs with the text embedded as images. This means one has to pan through the page, because the display is too small. I am using a 10.8 inch display myself, which is just big enough for displaying a complete page of a patent publication. EP documents are quite alright, US documents use a slightly smaller print and are, as far as I am concerned, on the limit of what is considered comfortable reading. (It helps to use the reader in landscape mode, and fit the page to page width, but then with the two column format used in US publications, one is scrolling up and down again. However, it is usable.) Lastly, because PDF patent publications use embedded images for representing text, they do not allow for text searching. Another possible strength of an e-book reader becomes less valuable this way. My remarks above concentrate a bit on PDF. This is because that is the format I ended up using the most. As noted, at present ePub is not readily available, and after one and a half year of use, I prefer not to spend too much time reassembling my own material. For example, if one was to prepare an EPC text, the EPO offers a PDF document, or an enormous tree of HTML-pages, each page containing one EPC article or rule. This takes too much time for a single individual to assemble and then maintain with each change of the rules. I now stick to the PDF document (which however is not updated with every change of the rules). Probably, in a number of years e-reader hardware has improved. I envisage devices with the size and weight of an iPad, a fast colour e-paper display (either eInk, or an alternative reflective technology) and the processing power of a laptop. By that time the publishing industry hopefully has picked up the line too and publishes legal texts in e-book formats (indeed hopefully without DRM so I can still use it on my new devices, even after 10 or 15 years), the documents containing tables of contents and fully cross linked by cross references. At present I am the only patent attorney in our firm working with an e-book reader. Although my colleagues find it interesting, I still do not consider it a break through product within our professional business and do not encourage my colleagues to use an e-reader. (However, neither do I discourage them.) We need some more evolution for that.
Hi, this web site is good. It is a WYSIWYG ebook editor designed to edit books in ePub format. It is more like reading on non-bleached, recycled paper. (E-book readers without touch displays, or alternatively using Wacom technology apparently have a slightly better contrast.)
=========================== PLR Dating Ebooks |
ProfileList Of LinksLinkedIn GroupsBlogroll
Bob Sutor's Website and Blog
Tangible IP Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy IAM magazine - Blog Intellectual Property Watch IP Asset Maximizer Blog IPKat - news and fun for everyone! The Invent Blog® Patent Baristas Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) Peer to Patent Class 46 - for your European trade mark news NIPC IP/IT Update Patent Docs Better Mousetrap Blog BlawgIT phosita TechnoLlama Suepo Visae Patentes CC LicenceExcept where otherwise noted, content on this site is licenced under the terms of a Creative Commons 3.0 Licence as follows: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||