CONTENT SYNDICATION
*ATOM* FEED:


 

CONTENT SYNDICATION
RSS 0.91 FEED:


 

BLOGROLL OPML:

BLOGROLL OPML FILE

 


Search in IPJUR.COM

 

[Powered by Google]

  

BLOG@IP::JUR

Patent Attorney Axel H Horns' Blog on Intellectual Property Law.

 

INTERNAL LINKDisclaimer & About This Website

 

 

INTERNAL LINK Visit the archives

 

Friday, December 01, 2006

 

Enforcing Patents on CIIs in Germany.

Unlike in the U.S. and the UK, in Germany there is a general rule that court files in civil proceedings are treated as confidential and opened for inspection only if a legitimate interest supporting such a request is demonstrated by third parties. As a habit of tradition, with regard to lower and regional courts only selected decisions are anonymised and then published in law journals in order to keep professionals up to date. Only recently more and more courts start on a large scale publishing shortened and anonymised decisions on the Internet. In practice, this makes it in particular quite difficult to obtain an overall view on numbers and outcomes of patent infringement proceedings based on patents on computer-implemented inventions in Germany.

Anti-patent activists are used to claim that patents on computer-implemented inventions or so-called "software patents" are not only "illegal" but also "unenforceable". See, for instance, EXTERNAL LINKthe presentation of Mr. James Heald, FFII UK, at the conference EXTERNAL LINKSoftware Patents: A Time for Change? held on November 16 and 17, 2006, at MIT and Boston University stating that there are "no examples (yet) of successful litigation in court for infringement". In this context I just stumbled over EXTERNAL LINKa publication on EXTERNAL LINKplayfuls.com:
"[...] A District Court in Germany (Landgericht Düsseldorf) today announced verdicts finding that German DVD disc manufacturer Optical Disc Service ('ODS') has infringed certain patents licensed in the MPEG-2 Patent Portfolio License offered by MPEG LA as a result of ODS's manufacture of DVD discs. The verdict of infringement as a result of DVD disc manufacturing issued in eight of nine cases brought by six patent holders who are Licensors to MPEG LA's MPEG-2 Patent Portfolio License. [...]"
OK, one single case does not make up full statistics but at least it shows that FFII is wrong when asserting that so-called "software patents" are generally unenforceable in Germany.

Technorati Tags: EXTERNAL LINK

INTERNAL LINK[Permalink]

 


 

ODS did not claimed that the patents were invalid.

They have not used art 52.2, and I wonder if they can still use it in appeal.
 
 

 


 

They could file a nullity action with the Federal Patents Court (if they have not already done so).
 
 
INTERNAL LINKPost a Comment

INTERNAL LINK Visit the archives

 

INTERNAL LINK< ? law blogs # >

 

INTERNAL LINKTechnorati Profile

 

BLOGROLL