"Counterfeiting and piracy have emerged as clear and serious threats to business, consumers and government. No product is too cheap to counterfeit and no brand immune; luxury goods, foodstuffs, automotive parts, sophisticated pharmaceuticals and electronics are all threatened. As a result the UK loses both money and economic knowledge.
It is now generally recognised that IP crime has a serious economic effect in the UK. Counterfeiting and piracy of branded products is estimated by some industry sources to cost the UK economy at least £9 billion a year.
The Patent Office is looking at how we can widen our role in helping fight intellectual property crime, that is, crime involving trade marks and copyright.
Our IP Crime Group has established aims and on 10 August 2004 published the first National IP Crime Strategy (pdf file 929Kb) to co-ordinate the efforts of many enforcers and rights owners to best effect."
UK Consultation on the Ratification Process For The "London Agreement"
The UK-PTO has launched a consultation on the ratification process for the "London Agreement" (The Agreement on Application of Article 65 of the European Patent Convention EPC). Feedback to this consultation should be returned by Tuesday 30 November 2004.
The Economist: "After Babel, a new common tongue - It turns out to be English"
The Economist runs in its latest issue an interesting article concerning the distribution of foreign language skills in Europe. They write:
"It turns out to be English
IN THE 17th century, educated people across central Europe could still communicate with each other in Latin. By the mid-19th century, the handiest language for a traveller through Mitteleuropa was the German spoken by the Habsburg monarchs who reigned over Hungarians, Czechs and many others. A little more than 100 years later, the dominant tongue was Russian.
Now the region's new language of choice for the 21st century is percolating upwards through the education system, and downwards from the business and political elite. It will be English, studied by three out of four secondary-school pupils from the Baltic to the Balkans. [...]"
This is good news. The EU policy should be adapted accordingly. Instead of further nurturing a gigantic translation apparatus for managing documents in a babylonic multitude of national languages, the reality should be faced. That means: English is and will be the 'lingua franca' throughout Europe for any forseeable future. And I hope that the next attempt to establish something like a EU Community Patent will take this fact into account: English should be the only Official language admissible for the proceedings before the competent patent office(s). In an earlier article, The Economist had written in 2003:
"What do outsiders think of the Nordic people? The list of stereotypes ranges widely: they are good-looking, hard-drinking, heavily taxed and prone to suicide. They are also taciturn, but when they do open their mouths, they speak rather good English. These generalisations may or may not apply to any particular individual, but the point about proficiency in English seems to be true for the vast majority of the region's inhabitants. Most children now learn the language from the age of nine or ten, or even younger. English is quickly becoming the Nordic countries' lingua franca. [...]"
Slashdotreports about some unease concerning possible patent infringements in conjunction with the planned migration of the IT systems of the City of Munich to Linux-based solutions. See also Expatica. So, why did the municipal administration not check that issue earlier? Even if they had decided to renew their contract with Microsoft they might have run IT procedures falling under some patents. It looks as if the whole thing is carefully plotted by FFII in order to stir things. They now enjoy a perfect media coverage for free. FFII claims to have conducted a search for patents potentially infringed by the Munich Linux project. However, the list merely compiles dozens of patent publication numbers, some of them even for US patents surely not affecting the Munich project. No scrutiniseable explanations are given on why the mentioned patents are considered to be infringed. Many of the indications are purely speculative. And, finally, even numbers of patent applications not yet granted are given. But, nevertheless, they have got what they want: A big media coverage as well as generating widespread FUD also in the administration of the German Parliament ("Bundestag") where the migration of some backend IT systems to Linux is also on the agenda.
Feel free to contact PA Axel H Horns via e-mail
horns@ipjur.com. BEWARE: DO NOT SEND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION UNENCRYPTED VIA E-MAIL. USE OF ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED. PA AXEL H HORNS IS PROVIDING SUPPORT FOR ENCRYPTED E-MAIL MESSAGES USING PGP OR PGP COMPATIBLE FORMATS. THE PGP PUBLIC KEY FOR PA AXEL H HORNS IS AVAILABLE
HERE. THE GnuPG PUBLIC KEY FOR PA AXEL H HORNS IS AVAILABLE
HERE.
Dipl.-Phys. Axel H Horns is Patentanwalt (German Patent Attorney),
European Patent Attorney as well as European Trade Mark Attorney. In particular, he is Member of: