CONTENT SYNDICATION
*ATOM* FEED:


 

CONTENT SYNDICATION
RSS 0.91 FEED:


 

BLOGROLL OPML:

BLOGROLL OPML FILE

 


Search in IPJUR.COM

 

[Powered by Google]

  

BLOG@IP::JUR

Patent Attorney Axel H Horns' Blog on Intellectual Property Law.

 

INTERNAL LINKDisclaimer & About This Website

 

 

INTERNAL LINK Visit the archives

 

Thursday, January 29, 2004

 

Coming SPLT Deliberations in 2004.

On May 10 - 14, 2004, the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP) will gather in Geneva for the tenth session to continue deliberations on a Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT). A number of EXTERNAL LINKrelevant documents are available on the EXTERNAL LINKWIPO website. The present EXTERNAL LINKrevised version of the draft Substantive Patent Law Treaty takes into account the views expressed in the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents at its EXTERNAL LINKninth session which was held from May 12 to 16, 2003.

Concerning Articles 11 to 16 of the recent SPLT draft version, since no discussion was held on these provisions at the ninth session of the SCP, the text of the draft SPLT contained in EXTERNAL LINKdocument SCP/9/2 is kept substantially unchanged. This is also relevant for Article 12 defining material conditions of patentability. In particular, it is still to be determined whether "Subject matter eligible for protection shall include products and processes which can be made and used in any field of activity" or "Subject matter eligible for protection shall include products and processes, in all fields of technology, which can be made and used in any field of activity" shall apply. The clause "in all fields of technology" might well make a difference concerning business methods and computer-implemented inventions. Within this context, EXTERNAL LINKDocument SCP/8/8 "Summary of the Chair" of the EXTERNAL LINKeigth Session (November 25 - 29, 2002) reads: "[...] A couple of interventions suggested that the presence or absence of the word 'technical' went beyond the issue of patentable subject matter. On the other hand, it was recognized that the term 'technical' was a fundamental issue for a number of delegations. It was agreed that the discussion concerning the term “technical” in Rules 4 and 5 should be postponed until the SCP reached a conclusion regarding patentable subject matter under draft Article 12(1). [...] "

However, the fate of the SPLT might well be dim. There are rumours that currently in particular the US are not very eager to push this project ahead. Ok, we shall wait and see.

INTERNAL LINK[Permalink]

INTERNAL LINK Visit the archives

 

INTERNAL LINK< ? law blogs # >

 

INTERNAL LINKTechnorati Profile

 

BLOGROLL