CONTENT SYNDICATION
*ATOM* FEED:


 

CONTENT SYNDICATION
RSS 0.91 FEED:


 

BLOGROLL OPML:

BLOGROLL OPML FILE

 


Search in IPJUR.COM

 

[Powered by Google]

  

BLOG@IP::JUR

Patent Attorney Axel H Horns' Blog on Intellectual Property Law.

 

INTERNAL LINKDisclaimer & About This Website

 

 

INTERNAL LINK Visit the archives

 

Wednesday, November 19, 2003

 

Proposal for a EU Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights.

The Secretary-General of the European Commission has prepared a EXTERNAL LINKDocument No. 14215/03 on a "Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation EXTERNAL LINK(EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights".

In an "Explanatory Memorandum" forming a part of the above-mentioned Document, a statement concerning the political reasons for the proposed amendment is provided as quoted below: "Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 on Community Plant Variety Rights is inconsistent with Article 12 of the EXTERNAL LINKBiotechnology Patents Directive 98/44/EC on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. In February 1998 the Council called on the Commission to examine this inconsistency and to submit an appropriate proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 2100/94. A plant variety may be protected by a plant variety right but may also contain one or several biotechnological inventions which are themselves protected by a patent, e.g. patented genetic components. These intellectual property rights may be owned by different persons. In the case of disagreement between the various intellectual property owners, both legislations provide that compulsory measures (exploitation rights or cross licensing) may be granted to ensure that the plant variety or patent may be exploited, but only when justified. Under Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 this may be done only on the grounds of 'public interest'. Under Directive 98/44/EC, a compulsory exploitation right can be granted if it would constitute a 'significant technical progress of considerable economic interest', but not a general 'public interest'. The proposed amendment to Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 will resolve this inconsistency: 1. It will provide coherence of the system of compulsory licensing provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights and Directive 98/44/EC on biotechnological inventions. 2. To enable the exploitation of a patented biotechnological invention, the Community Plant Variety Office can grant to the patent holder a compulsory licence for the use of a protected plant variety containing his invention. Applicants for the compulsory licences must demonstrate that; - they have applied unsuccessfully to the holder of the plant variety right to obtain a contractual licence; and - the biotechnological invention constitutes a significant technical progress of considerable economic interest compared with the protected plant variety. 3. The holder of the patent can be granted a cross-licence to exploit the plant variety containing his biotechnological invention, if the holder of a plant variety right has been granted a compulsory licence for the use of this patented invention under Directive 98/44/EC. "

INTERNAL LINK[Permalink]

INTERNAL LINK Visit the archives

 

INTERNAL LINK< ? law blogs # >

 

INTERNAL LINKTechnorati Profile

 

BLOGROLL